Log in

No account? Create an account
27 Juli 2008 @ 13:15
John McCain really doesn't know the difference between Iraq and Afghanistan  

As discussed in a recent post on Language Log, John McCain has an interesting tendency to say "Iraq" when one might expect to hear "Afghanistan." In the most notorious example, he referred to "the Iraq-Pakistan border"; this led to some speculation about whether he really thought there was such a border (the least charitable hypothesis), or whether it was just a slip of the tongue (Mark Liberman's charitable interpretation), or whether "the Iraq-Pakistan border" is the new way to say "Iran" (my suggestion).

From what I heard on CBC Radio last night, though, I'm now inclined to think that McCain really does think that Afghanistan and Iraq are the same place. The CBC played a clip in which McCain made an ‘argument’ that can be paraphrased as follows:

  1. Barack Obama says that the U.S. should send more troops to Afghanistan.
  2. Sending more troops constitutes a surge.
  3. But Barack Obama said that the surge in Iraq was a bad idea.
  4. Therefore, Barack Obama is being inconsistent. Nyeah, nyeah, nyeah!

McCain's reasoning is sound if and only if "Iraq" and "Afghanistan" refer to the same place, or perhaps if there is One Correct Strategy that applies to all conflicts everywhere. If John McCain believes either one of those things, it would be extremely foolish and dangerous to put him in charge of deciding where to deploy U.S. military forces.

UPDATE: This post has now been incorporated into Number 35 in The Ridger's series called What's Important, an enlightening and frequently alarming look at John McCain's misguided and fluctuating platform and his disingenuous campaign tactics.

Oh, Snap!kutsuwamushi on 27. Juli, 2008 18:35 (UTC)
I wonder what President Putin of Germany thinks about McCain's foreign policy knowledge.